Clinical Outcomes
The
Closure® Procedure -- A Treatment That Works
Clinical results indicate
that the Closure procedure can be effective at closing the vein and
significantly reducing patient symptoms.
At two years following
treatment, patients who had undergone the Closure procedure reported superior
quality of life compared to vein stripping patients.1
The Closure procedure has
proven to be highly effective, with more than 90% of veins treated remaining
reflux free at two years.1 Results also demonstrate long-term relief of
symptoms.2

Three
randomized trials of the Closure procedure versus vein stripping, including the
multi-center comparative trial published August 2003 in the Journal of Vascular
Surgery, show very similar results.2,3,4 In the most recent trial every statistically
significant outcome was in favor of the Closure procedure, resulting in:2
- Experienced less post-operative pain and
bruising
- Resumed normal activities within one day
- Returned to work more than a week earlier than
vein stripping patients
Visual
Results:5
Pre-Treatment
1 Week Post Closure Procedure
Percent of Legs Without Varicose Veins at
Follow-up
The
Closure procedure is shown to be effective as vein stripping in delaying the
reappearance of varicose veins.
|
Treatment
|
1 Year
|
2 Years
|
|
Closure6
Vein Stripping7
Ligation7
|
90%
85%
86%
|
87%
75%
57%
|
1 Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick
LS, Kistner RL, Pichot O, et al. Prospective randomized study of endovenous
radiofrequency obliteration (Closure) versus ligation and stripping in a
selected patient population (EVOLVES study). J Vasc Surg 2003;38:207-14.
2 Date on file – VNUS Medical
Technologies, Inc.
3 Stötter L. Schaaf I, Fendl R,
Bockelbrink A. Randomized Study to Compare the Closure Procedure, Invagination
Stripping and Cryo Stripping for Treatment of the Greater Saphenous Vein.
Abstract submitted to German Society for Phlebology for presentation Sept.
2003.
4
Rautio T, Ohinmaa A, Perälä J, Ohtonen P, Heikkinen T, Wiik H, et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional
stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: A randomized
controlled trial with comparison of costs.
J Vasc Surg 2002;35:958-65.
5 Photos Courtesy of
Michael A. Vasquez, MD, F.A.C.S.
6 Merchant RF, DePalma RG, Kabnick
LS. Endovascular Obliteration of
Saphenous Reflux: A Multicenter Study. J
Vasc Surg 2002;35:1190-6.
7 Jones L et al. Neovascularisation is the Principal Cause
of Varicose Vein Recurrence: Results of a Randomized Trial Of Stripping The
Long Saphenous Vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12:442-445.
|